Regress from Progress
A Study of Dehumanization in
the Works of
Aldous Huxley
Objectives:
After completing this session, the attendee
will be able to identify effects of repetition beyond emphasis, recognize the
importance of dialogue and narrative structure in building the motif of voice,
analyze the irony of inhuman figurative language used to describe humans and
vice versa, and an understanding of how these elements create paradox in Aldous
Huxley’s works.
Literature and Poetry Discussed:
·
Brave New
World by Aldous Huxley
·
Ape and
Essence by Aldous Huxley
·
“When I Heard
the Learn’d Astronomer” by Walt Whitman
·
“Howl” by
Allen Ginsberg
Most Relevant Literary Devices:
·
Repetition,
Dialogue, Personification, Metaphor
·
Omniscient
Third-Person Narrative: narration is a means through which the author is able
to communicate their perfect knowledge of the events and characters of the
novel
·
Paradox:
a statement or
proposition that seems
self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a
possible truth (Dictionary.com)
Things to Consider
- Repetition mimics propaganda—once an idea has been heard over and over and over again, it begins to sound like the truth
- Huxley criticizes the dangers of unconsciously believing in propaganda not for its content but for its ability to linger in the mind
- Repetition continues as a message for individuality: even words, when repeated consistently, lose their meaning
- If humans are to do the same, and conform to one another, we will lose our meaning and our sense of self as well
- Because the narrative structure is third-person omniscient, most of the characters’ inner thoughts and feelings are expressed within the narrative, not within the dialogue by their own voices
- In fact, aside from the dialogue of the powerful government officials Mustapha Mond and the Arch-Vicar, dialogue remains painfully lacking in depth or personal thought
- Implies that assertions based on one’s own life and perceptions will fade if the trend to conformity continues—no longer used as the basis for opinions, the human experience will become unnecessary
- Humans consistently termed and identified as animals, whether by an actual species name or by “ape” or “primate”
- clear degradation of the line between humanity and the animal kingdom, notes that as humans submit more to their primal urges and abandon self-control from temptations, the more bestial they’ll become
- On the contrary, scientific technologies are given human characteristics through personification, calling into question what—or rather, who—really has control in the relationship between man and machine
No comments:
Post a Comment